Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive tract: incorporating the 2019 WHO grading schema in the South African context
Background: The classification of gastrointestinal (GI) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has been updated in the WHO classification of tumours of the digestive tract. Mitotic rate and Ki-67 proliferation index are central to the histopathological grading of these tumours. Assessing these variables is not standardised in local practice. This study addresses this deficit in the South African context.
Methods: This is a retrospective audit of archival material of resection specimens of GI NENs (excluding appendix) at Groote Schuur Hospital from 2004 to 2017. We performed a mitotic count and immunohistochemistry for Ki-67 to reclassify tumours according to the 2019 WHO criteria.
Results: Thirty-five resection specimens were examined. These represented stomach (n = 5), jejunoileum (n = 17), colon (n = 7) and rectum (n = 6). The mean age at the time of resection was 56 years (range 32–72). Twenty-one cases (60%) were women and 14 (40%) were men. The majority (24/35) of tumours were classified as grade 1 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (WD NETs), 8/35 were classified as grade 2 WD NETs and 3/35 were classified as small cell poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (PD NECs). Re-classification resulted in 7/35 (20%) changes in tumour grade (4 upgraded, 3 downgraded). In most instances (7/8), the Ki-67 proliferation index was the determining factor in assigning tumour grade.
Conclusion: This study has increased awareness of the recently updated WHO classification system. We conclude that an objective and systematic approach to counting of mitoses and determination of the Ki-67 proliferation index is recommended in routine practice.
The South African Journal of Surgery (SAJS) reserves copyright of the material published. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial Works 4.0 South Africa License. Material submitted for publication in the SAJS is accepted provided it has not been published elsewhere. The SAJS does not hold itself responsible for statements made by the authors.